This is your secret weapon if you want to use it. It protects you against being blamed for something for which you appear to be responsible.
It's been used by everyone from the CIA to your commuter railroad -- with varying degrees of success.
Early on, the spy agency compartmentalized activities so that no single spy knew the entirety of an operation. Thus, if captured, the agent couldn't tell a hostile power the whole story. That might end badly for the agent, but not for the agency. The captive might even be able to convince said hostile power that he really IS a "cultural attaché, and not someone seeking secret info from say the nuke program in Fiji.
The late John Gotti, reputed gangster, said he was a salesman of plumbing supplies. And, yes, there was a plumbing supply business with his name on it. Does anyone think he ever sold a single sink washer? Or even knew what a sink washer was? So in the world of weaponry, this is a plausible denial that jams or misfires.
The Long Island Railroad loves to survey its riders.
The surveys have said the same thing for more than a century. Dirty cars, late trains, overcrowding. The railroad's answer? "We have a clean train campaign. We have a 'watch the gap' campaign. We're trying. Really." Plausible deniability.
Same story with hearings on fare increases. Everyone with something to say says it. And then they do what they please and try to sugar coat it by pointing to a hearing record the size of Webster’s Unabridged. "See this," they'll say while waving a page of arithmetical static, “we listened. Really."
Professional wrestling: can the ref really say his back was turned and didn't see one guy hoist a folding chair and bring it down sharply on his opponent's head?
Here's the puzzling part. The people who use this weapon are, well, people. When they're on the receiving end, they look at it with the same incredulity that you do. And then they go back to the office, the shop, the campaign trail or the squared circle and continue using it as usual.
We hear an awful lot these days about taking responsibility for our actions, often a good idea and the right thing to do. But many who advocate this don't themselves do it. Instead, they haul out plausible deniability.
Believe them at your peril.
SHRAPNEL:
--Of course, lately there has been an outburst of IMplausible deniability. Example: “See! No collusion with Russia” or “The 737s are perfectly safe, look how many have not crashed.” Who are they trying to fool?
--The answer to that question is “you.” And you know you’re hearing a lie but don’t care because the liar is --to you-- so much fun. You let him (it’s usually a “him,”) get away with it.
I’m Wes Richards. My opinions are my own but you’re welcome to them. ®
Comments? wesrichards@gmail.com
© WJR 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment